• Kamala Harris has shifted her stance on fracking since her 2019 presidential campaign, now supporting its role in the U.S. energy mix.
  • Despite Trump’s claims, Harris emphasizes her commitment to fracking as part of the Inflation Reduction Act.
  • The complexities of U.S. energy production make a nationwide fracking ban highly unlikely, given its significant economic impact.

During the recent heated presidential debate, former President Donald Trump repeatedly claimed that Vice President Kamala Harris would ban hydraulic fracturing (fracking) if she becomes president. He asserted, “If she won the election, fracking in Pennsylvania will end on day one.”

In response, Harris clarified, “I will not ban fracking. I have not banned fracking as Vice President of the United States. In fact, I was the tie-breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction Act, which opened new leases for fracking.”

Trump’s claim wasn’t entirely without basis, as Harris had previously stated during her 2019 presidential campaign that “there’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.”

However, the reality is more nuanced because Harris, along with Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, has expressed support for a fracking ban. Even President Joe Biden campaigned on “no new fracking” before adjusting his position to acknowledge the necessity of fracking as part of an energy transition.

The truth is, political candidates often make statements to appeal to their base. Whether Harris was pandering or genuinely believed at one point that fracking should be banned, there is currently no practical way to stop it.

Fracking, which dates back to the late 1940s, sparked a U.S. oil and gas production boom when combined with horizontal drilling about 20 years ago. This surge in production has made the U.S. the world’s leading producer of both oil and natural gas.

Most of this production happens on private land, meaning that, even if Trump believes otherwise, Harris would have no authority to end fracking in Pennsylvania on her first day in office.

New laws would be required to halt fracking, and given its significant role in U.S. energy production, it’s highly unlikely Congress would pass such a law.

As a result, it’s a moot point. As an energy sector expert with decades of experience in the oil industry, I still don’t believe a ban on fracking will ever happen.

Stay Current on the Future of Energy

Reporting on all things energy, we keep our readers ahead of the curve on the latest developments changing the landscape. Subscribe to Shale Magazine to keep current on energy news, sustainability leaps, and economic intelligence.

When you’re on the go, check out our critically acclaimed podcast, The Energy Mixx Radio Show where we feature the latest insights from top leaders in the energy industry.

Subscribe to get more posts from Robert Rapier

 

Previous articleClean Energy Investments Surpass Fossil Fuels in 2024
Next articleGreen Hydrogen in the U.S. Takes Center Stage in Clean Energy Push
Robert Rapier
Robert Rapier is a chemical engineer in the energy industry and Editor-in-Chief of Shale Magazine. Robert has 25 years of international engineering experience in the chemicals, oil and gas, and renewable energy industries and holds several patents related to his work. He has worked in the areas of oil refining, oil production, synthetic fuels, biomass to energy, and alcohol production. He is author of multiple newsletters for Investing Daily and of the book Power Plays. Robert has appeared on 60 Minutes, The History Channel, CNBC, Business News Network, CBC, and PBS. His energy-themed articles have appeared in numerous media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor, and The Economist.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here