The Department of the Interior has completed a 60-day public review of how federal agencies manage wilderness study areas, lands with wilderness characteristics, and recreational rock climbing. The process closed August 14, 2026, and could influence recreation access, conservation policy, mineral development, and transmission planning across federal public lands.
The review covers the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Park Service. It does not immediately redesignate land or authorize new energy projects. Instead, it asks whether existing agency policies should be updated, clarified, or revised.
That distinction matters because federal land-management manuals often determine how agencies apply broader laws to specific decisions involving roads, leases, rights-of-way, recreation permits, and surface disturbance.
What Interior is reviewing
According to the Department of the Interior’s June announcement, the review has two related parts.
First, Interior is considering consistent guidance for recreational rock climbing in designated wilderness areas, including how agencies should evaluate fixed anchors, bolts, and other equipment. The department said the objective is to improve clarity for climbers, land managers, and partners while maintaining compliance with existing law and protecting public safety.
Second, Interior is reviewing policies governing wilderness study areas and lands with wilderness characteristics. The review includes:
| Agency | Policy documents under review | Core management issue |
|---|---|---|
| Bureau of Land Management | Manuals 6320, 6330, and 6340 | Wilderness characteristics, WSAs, and designated wilderness |
| U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service | Part 610 of the FWS Manual | Wilderness stewardship on refuges and hatcheries |
| National Park Service | Director’s Order No. 41 | Wilderness management and recreation in national parks |
Interior described the effort as part of a broader push to expand outdoor recreation, reduce administrative barriers, and create more consistent and transparent management practices.
The review follows implementation of the EXPLORE Act, which Congress enacted in 2025 to expand and improve outdoor recreation opportunities on federal lands. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s Secretarial Order 3435 established the department’s implementation framework for the law.
Why wilderness study areas matter
A wilderness study area is not the same as a congressionally designated wilderness area. WSAs are lands identified as having wilderness characteristics that remain under review or are being managed in anticipation of a future congressional decision.
Under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, BLM must manage many WSAs so that activities do not impair their suitability for preservation as wilderness. The agency’s current Manual 6330 describes the non-impairment standard as generally requiring uses to be temporary and free of new surface disturbance, subject to specific exceptions.
The existing manual also states that BLM cannot issue new oil and gas leases within WSAs. New coal leasing is prohibited as well. Existing valid rights, including certain mineral leases, mining claims, and rights-of-way, receive different treatment depending on when they were established and the terms of the underlying authorization.
“Lands with wilderness characteristics” present a more complicated policy question. Unlike many WSAs, these lands may be identified through BLM’s land-use planning process under Section 202 of FLPMA. They do not automatically receive the same legal treatment as designated wilderness or every WSA. Depending on the applicable resource-management plan, BLM may protect those characteristics, restrict surface occupancy, defer leasing, or allow certain uses with mitigation.
That difference gives the review potential significance beyond recreation policy. A change to how agencies identify, document, or manage wilderness-quality lands could influence future decisions about leasing, mining, roads, pipelines, and electric transmission.
Competing views on the review
Interior says the review can improve consistency and help the public use federal lands while agencies continue to follow applicable laws. Recreation groups and access advocates may benefit if agencies establish clearer rules for climbing, permitting, hunting, fishing, and other activities.
Climbers have faced different procedures across federal agencies and individual land units. Interior’s proposed guidance seeks to create a more predictable framework for evaluating climbing routes and fixed anchors. The department also connected the effort to public safety and continued access to major climbing destinations.
Current National Park Service policy treats fixed anchors as installations that require authorization in wilderness. Director’s Order No. 41 says fixed anchors should be rare and that bolt-intensive routes are inconsistent with wilderness preservation. The proposed review could clarify how park superintendents apply those standards.
Conservation organizations and Senate Democrats have raised different concerns. In a letter reported by E&E News, Sen. Martin Heinrich and nine other Democratic senators argued that policy changes could weaken protections for WSAs and lands that Congress may later consider for wilderness designation.
Their concern is that new roads, intensive recreation, mineral activity, or other surface-disturbing uses could alter wilderness characteristics before Congress decides whether to designate or release an area. The senators also questioned whether Interior should use general policy reviews to make changes that could affect lands traditionally managed with congressional authority in mind.
The two positions are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Consistent recreation guidance could improve public access and safety, while changes to land-management standards could still require careful analysis of cumulative impacts, existing rights, and congressional authority.
The broader energy implications
The policy review does not create an immediate opening for oil and gas leasing or transmission construction. However, it could affect the long-term location and timing of energy projects on federal lands.
Under current BLM policy, new federal oil and gas leasing is prohibited inside WSAs. Transmission lines, pipelines, and other new rights-of-way are also generally unavailable when they would fail the non-impairment standard. Existing rights-of-way and valid existing mineral rights may continue, but BLM can impose conditions intended to reduce impacts.
That creates several potential effects for the energy sector.
| Energy activity | Current WSA constraint | What future policy changes could affect |
|---|---|---|
| Oil and gas leasing | New leasing generally prohibited | Boundary interpretation, adjacent-land analysis, and treatment of lands with wilderness characteristics |
| Coal and other leasable minerals | New coal leasing prohibited in WSAs | Planning decisions outside formal WSAs |
| Mining claims | Existing rights receive special treatment | Access, operating conditions, and cumulative-impact analysis |
| Transmission | New rights-of-way generally restricted | Route selection and treatment of wilderness-quality lands |
| Pipelines and roads | Surface disturbance is tightly limited | Siting alternatives, mitigation, and agency review procedures |
The effect will vary by designation. A transmission developer cannot assume that every parcel described as having wilderness characteristics is legally closed to infrastructure. Conversely, a project near a WSA may face additional environmental analysis, route changes, visual-impact mitigation, or restrictions designed to protect the study area.
This is increasingly relevant as utilities and industrial customers seek new generation and transmission capacity. The United States is adding data centers, manufacturing facilities, liquefied natural gas infrastructure, hydrogen projects, and other large electricity loads. As discussed in SHALE’s analysis of the 2026 natural gas and renewables reliability strategy, the challenge is not only producing electricity. It is also siting and connecting the infrastructure required to deliver it.
The growing need for grid workers and construction capacity adds another constraint. Longer permitting timelines or more difficult routes can increase project costs, although protecting sensitive lands may reduce environmental and legal risks later in the development process.
A wider recreation agenda
The wilderness review comes as Interior expands access across several categories of public-land use.
On August 13, the department announced what it described as the largest expansion of hunting and sport fishing opportunities in Fish and Wildlife Service history. The action involves more than 92 million acres, or over 95% of National Wildlife Refuge System lands, according to Interior.
The department also announced National Park Week for August 22–30. Together, these actions show how recreation access has become a central theme in federal land management.
Federal refuge lands included in the August announcement
Available for hunting or fishing 92+ million acres | ███████████████████ 95%+
Other refuge acreage Less than 5% | █
The refuge expansion is separate from the wilderness policy review. It does, however, demonstrate the broader policy environment in which agencies are weighing public access, conservation responsibilities, and management capacity.
What to watch next
The comment period has closed, but the policy process is not complete. The next steps could include revised agency manuals, final climbing guidance, bureau-specific implementation documents, or additional environmental and land-use planning reviews.
Several issues will be important.
- Final policy language will show whether Interior primarily clarifies existing standards or changes how agencies evaluate recreation and wilderness-quality lands.
- Energy project reviews will indicate whether revised guidance affects leasing, transmission routes, rights-of-way, or mitigation requirements.
- Congressional involvement could increase if lawmakers believe policy changes affect lands awaiting a wilderness decision.
- Litigation remains possible if conservation groups, recreation organizations, states, tribes, or industry participants argue that agencies exceeded their authority or failed to follow required procedures.
- The multiple-use mandate will remain a central test for BLM. Federal law requires the agency to balance energy production, recreation, grazing, conservation, and other uses, while applying special protections where Congress has directed it to do so.
The review therefore reaches beyond climbing policy. It could shape how federal agencies balance recreation access, conservation, mineral rights, and infrastructure needs across millions of acres. The most consequential decisions will come later, when Interior converts the review into final guidance and applies that guidance to specific land-use plans, permits, leases, and project proposals.
Keep In Touch with Shale Magazine
As the new era of energy unfolds, you can bet we’ll be the boots on the ground to keep you informed. Subscribe to Shale Magazine for sharp insight into the arenas that matter most to your life. And don’t forget to listen to our riveting podcast, The Energy Mixx Radio Show, where our very own Kym Bolado interviews the most extraordinary thought leaders, business innovators, and industry experts of our time.
