Photo by: Michael Giordano
David Porter: Getting The Job Done
Sitting down with the Railroad Commission of Texas Chairman David Porter could be an intimidating experience, that is, if you are not already well-acquainted with Porter himself.
The Chairman’s window-lined corner office sits on the top floor of the William B. Travis Building and clearly overlooks the Texas Capitol, just two blocks up the road. Porter slowly reclines in his leather wingback chair as he carefully formulates and thoughtfully delivers intelligent, direct responses.
The state official has sometimes been described as shy, although those that know him on a personal level would laugh at such a mischaracterization. He is reserved by nature, but what some may perceive as timidity is more likely evidence of the intense thought process and weighty balancing act constantly occurring in his mind.
As the senior regulator of the Texas oil and gas industry, Porter has been tasked with the dual responsibility of protecting the health and safety of Texans while simultaneously promoting and facilitating the efficient and economic production of the state’s natural resources — a duty he does not take lightly.
Throughout his nearly six years as Railroad Commissioner, Porter has proven to be a pragmatic, astute decision-maker and an effective leader. He may not always deliver the best 30-second sound bite and seldom seizes an opportunity to grandstand. But he does deliver consistent results and steady, fact-based regulation.
Porter arrived on the Austin political scene in 2010 as somewhat of an unknown. The conservative Republican had lived a low-key life in Midland where he owned a small accounting business, primarily catering to independent oil and gas and oilfield service companies, and raised a daughter with his wife, Cheryl. He had long been active in politics, having served as a precinct Chairman for the Republican Party and a stint on the local hospital board, in addition to being involved with dozens of campaigns in some capacity.
His bid for a spot on the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC), however, was his first personal foray into the public arena. The newcomer successfully unseated a longtime incumbent — something that is not easy to accomplish — and had many wondering, “Who is David Porter?”
Those who have followed his career on the Commission closely have witnessed the subtle transformation of this seemingly quiet accountant from West Texas into a dignified, well-respected statesman.
With that said, Porter is still far from being a big-city bureaucrat or entrenched Austin insider.
“I’m proud that I never had a government office or paid position before I ran for Railroad Commissioner,” he says. “I really still don’t consider myself a politician.”
Politician or not, Porter has certainly come into his own. Yet even as he has fully grown into his leadership role, now serving as Chairman of the RRC, he hasn’t lost the genuine traits that make him a welcome anomaly in the state’s highly politicized capital.
“I’ve always believed the old adage that it’s amazing how much you can get done as long as you don’t care who gets credit for it, which is a little unusual in this city,” he says.
Porter’s ability to get things done and bring people together in an efficient and productive manner is truly the hallmark of his tenure at the Railroad Commission, a legacy he hopes to continue for another six-year term.
The Chairman has officially announced his bid for reelection to the three-member Commission in 2016. While some candidates on the campaign trail make overstretched and sometimes unrealistic promises, the no-fuss incumbent must only point to his history at the Commission as proof of his ability to lead the historic agency and regulate one of the most robust, essential industries in Texas.
Fighting For Survival
One of the biggest testaments to his leadership came within days of being sworn in as Commissioner. Porter was immediately thrown into the deep end — forced to fight to maintain the structure and existence of the 124-year-old Railroad Commission.
In Texas, nearly all state agencies and government entities undergo a Sunset review about every 12 years to ensure it is still necessary and functioning efficiently.
Texas Sunset Advisory Commission staff essentially conducts an audit of the agency under review and issues a detailed report, including recommendations to the Legislature, which then holds hearings and accepts public comment. Lawmakers proceed to file legislation determining the future of the agency based on the recommendations and input.
In 2011, the Railroad Commission was up for Sunset review, and sentiments toward the regulatory body were less than favorable.
“I got over here and quickly realized that unless something was done to argue for the benefits of the Commission, there was a good chance it was going to be basically destroyed, if not gone, by the end of the legislative session,” Porter recalls.
One of the most contentious items on Sunset’s list of recommendations was the proposal to completely restructure the agency’s leadership, going from three elected Commissioners instead to five appointees. Based on this suggestion, the Legislature also contemplated the notion of having only one elected Commissioner. Either way, Porter and his colleagues would essentially be out of a job.
“The actual result of [this] recommendation would be to vacate the votes of millions of Texans cast over the last three election cycles,” the new Commissioner said at the time. “I was recently elected to this office with nearly 60 percent of the vote — votes that should count — and intend to serve the people of Texas in the job they elected me to do.”
From day one, Porter has been an outspoken advocate of maintaining the current structure of the Commission as originally intended in the Texas Constitution.
“Limited government and balance of power within different sections of government are two of the most important fundamental principles on which our system of democracy was built,” Porter says. “Fast-forward a couple hundred years, and the same thinking is still valid.”
“You get more continuity, wisdom and judgment long-term by having the collective knowledge and experience of three people instead of one person,” he adds.
Other Sunset recommendations included transferring the Commission’s enforcement hearings and contested gas utility cases to the State Office of Administrative Hearings and moving gas utility regulation from the RRC to the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
For the first five or six months of his term, Porter basically camped out at the Texas Capitol, testifying before legislative panels and doing whatever he could to advocate for the continued well-being of the Commission.
Fortunately for the agency, the industry and Texas voters, Porter was successful in his attempt to defend the RRC from major disruptions, although the issue was not fully put to rest. Instead, the Railroad Commission would undergo another Sunset review the following session.
Sometimes you have to do the work behind the scenes; other times you have to get out in front and lead the band. I can do, and have done, both. Whatever it takes to get the job done.
In 2013, Sunset recommendations again focused on the Commissioners, however, this time addressing the appearance of conflicts of interest. The suggested provisions included limiting when Commissioners could solicit and receive campaign contributions, adoption of a recusal policy and automatic resignation of a Commissioner who announces candidacy for another office.
Railroad Commissioners have historically received criticism that the post is used as a stepping stone to run for higher office. While this may not apply to the current Commissioners, it is still an issue that they have been repeatedly prompted to address.
“I answer it this way: I haven’t run for any other offices and I have no intention of running for any other offices at the current point in time,” Porter asserts. Moreover, the Chairman is actively campaigning to keep his position on the Commission.
“If you look at the lack of success Railroad Commissioners have had running for other offices, I don’t know that that’s really a valid objection anymore,” he adds.
At the heart of the Commissioners’ defense over these issues is the fact that all executive branch elected officials are held to the same standards in the Texas Constitution; to unnecessarily target Railroad Commissioners and create a separate, higher standard would seem arbitrary at best.
In 2013, the discussions took an even more disconcerting turn when the idea of abolishing the agency entirely came into play. Some suggested the RRC was no longer necessary and should be essentially dismembered and parceled out to other state agencies.
Again, the Chairman went to bat for the agency and was successful in maintaining its continuation, although this means that the Railroad Commission will again be up for Sunset review in 2017.
Porter admits that the process can be arduous and puts a serious strain on the Commission’s staff and resources. Being a well-balanced leader, however, he points out that not all of the recommendations have been negative or overly critical.
Throughout the process, the RRC has voluntarily implemented some suggestions by Sunset staff in order to improve the agency. The Commission has increased transparency in its enforcement process, now publishing this information online; formally adopted penalty guidelines; and created a pipeline permit fee to help support its Pipeline Safety program.
Yet with a third Sunset review staring down the agency, it would be advantageous to have a strong advocate who has gone through the process not just once but twice.
“It’s important for somebody to be here who has a history with Sunset and extensive experience defending the agency, someone who is familiar with the issues and can talk about these issues knowledgeably, someone who has helped make a lot of the recommended changes and has seen their positive impact firsthand,” Porter says.
Opening the Lines of Communication
While Porter may have fought diligently to stave off certain changes to the historic Railroad Commission, he has worked equally as hard to make some positive reforms of his own, especially in terms of public outreach and communication.
Shortly after taking office, Porter realized the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas was poised to become not just one of the biggest discoveries of oil and gas reserves, but also one of the most significant economic discoveries in our state’s history. As such, the new leader knew he needed to take proactive steps to ensure development of the region was handled properly.
“One of the main reasons I decided to run for Railroad Commissioner in 2009 was because of what had occurred in the Barnett Shale,” he begins.
In the early 2000s, oil and gas drilling activity in the Barnett Shale skyrocketed, as it was the first shale play to be commercially produced by the combination of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. It was also the first major play in Texas to be situated directly in a highly populated urban area, often putting petroleum production and residential communities at odds.
“The perception in the media and a lot of the general public, largely caused by radical environmentalists, was that the Railroad Commission was doing nothing — that oil and gas companies were not regulated and basically free to do whatever they wanted to do,” the state official explains. “Which is, of course, a misperception.”
In order to avoid some of those issues, Porter created the Eagle Ford Shale Task Force, the first of its kind at the agency.
The diverse 24-member task force is comprised of local community leaders, elected officials, oil and gas producers, water representatives, pipeline companies, oilfield service companies, and environmental and landowner interests.
The group has held numerous meetings throughout the South Texas region beginning in July 2011, and it tackled pressing issues such as workforce development; infrastructure; water quality and quantity; RRC regulations; economic benefits; flaring and air emissions; health, education and social services; and landowner, mineral owner and royalty owner issues.
“The task force really got people talking and working together,” the group’s founder says. “While not everything was perfect, development in the Eagle Ford — especially in terms of community relations — certainly went much smoother than in the Barnett Shale. The task force was a vital factor in that improvement and outcome,”
In March 2013, in the midst of the 83rd Legislative Session, Porter issued the Eagle Ford Shale Task Force Report. The 155-page compilation of information regarding development of the shale, as discussed by the task force, was the first comprehensive report written about an oil and gas shale play.
“The report gave a lot of members of the Legislature and Texas communities a solid knowledge base about what was going on in the Eagle Ford,” he explains, adding it intentionally lacks outright policy recommendations, especially given a majority of the topics discussed are tangential to oil and gas production but not necessarily within the RRC’s purview.
“We left it to the Legislature and local policy makers to use the information to determine what course of action they thought they should pursue.”
Not only was the report beneficial in the early stages of development, it continues to be a valuable educational resource.
“A lot of people since then have used parts of it,” Porter says. “It still has a lot of validity if someone wants to read through and get a general primer on what is going on in a big play.”
Porter’s proactive leadership and visionary approach toward development in the Eagle Ford quickly earned him attention and accolades, although he certainly won’t tell you that himself.
“Commissioner Porter showed exemplary leadership and great initiative when he created the Task Force in 2011,” former Texas Comptroller Susan Combs said in a press release issued at the time.
“I applaud Commissioner Porter’s efforts to take proactive measures [toward] ensuring the responsible development of the Eagle Ford Shale,” State Rep. Jim Keffer also said, who was at the time Chairman of the House Energy Resources Committee.
South Texas State Rep. Richard Peña Raymond even donned Porter “the new pope of the Eagle Ford” at a press conference announcing the release of the report. (The announcement of a new pope had also come earlier that day from the Vatican.)
In 2013, Porter was named “Man of the Year” by The Oil & Gas Year, Eagle Ford, Texas, as well as being recognized by SHALE Oil & Gas Business Magazine and Unconventional Oil & Gas Magazine for his foresight and guidance.
Fueling the Economy
Porter’s Eagle Ford Shale Task Force was a hit, but he didn’t stop there.
In October 2013, the Chairman launched his Texas Natural Gas Initiative in an effort to promote and increase the use of natural gas in Texas, focusing largely on expanding utilization by the transportation and exploration and production sectors.
“I realized, at that point in time, there was a huge dichotomy between how well the oil side of the industry was doing versus natural gas,” Porter recalls. Oil was averaging around $100 a barrel and heading higher, while natural gas was hovering around $3 to $4 per McF. “I thought if we really want to get the economy cracking, it would be good if gas was doing as well as oil.”
Porter goes on to explain the benefits of using clean-burning natural gas as a transportation fuel. The homegrown resource is abundant, with Texas accounting for nearly 30 percent of total U.S. natural gas production. Plus, natural gas production within our state directly bolsters the Texas economy, providing valuable jobs and significant tax revenue as well as encouraging capital investment in Texas businesses.
The Chairman has traveled the state hosting a series of events that bring stakeholders together to discuss business opportunities and challenges, as well as regulatory barriers and solutions for natural gas conversion and infrastructure.
The forums have been highly attended and have included pertinent lawmakers such as Commissioner Toby Baker of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and State Rep. Jason Isaac, member of the House Environmental Regulation Committee. Other notable attendees include State Sens. Carlos Uresti and Judith Zaffirini, plus State Reps. Drew Darby, Jim Keffer, Phil King, Geanie Morrison, Chris Paddie and David Simpson.
The 2014 series culminated with the first-ever Texas Natural Gas Summit & Job Fair in Austin last October.
Many important ideas and issues have been discussed, and real change has already come about as a direct result of Porter’s efforts. The Texas Department of Transportation began posting signage along highways indicating locations of natural gas refueling stations, which has helped natural gas vehicle owners and increased overall awareness of such alternative options.
Since launching his initiative, sales of natural gas as a transportation fuel in Texas have doubled, and the number of natural gas fueling stations has increased by an astounding 88 percent.
The Chairman has also worked to highlight other uses of natural gas, for example, as on-site generation for drilling rigs and related equipment. In December 2013, Porter hosted an on-site generation workshop at the Commission in Austin and discussed the use of natural gas to power equipment on-site at multiple workshops. As of July, 15 percent of drilling engines in the U.S. now use natural gas fuel.
The former accountant acknowledges that the rapid decline in oil prices has narrowed the differential between oil and natural gas significantly, which has somewhat slowed its adoption. But he maintains that long term, the benefits of using natural gas hold true and believes that natural gas will continue to provide a desirable alternative fuel source.
Porter’s Texas Natural Gas Initiative not only motivated many to convert to natural gas, it inspired others to carry on his mission a step further.
“[Rep.] Jason Isaac and Dr. Ken Morgan, of Texas Christian University, who were both very instrumental in helping with the workshops, very much believe in the direction that we were going and they decided to start a foundation to advance this goal from the nonprofit side,” he explains.
In August, an esteemed group of industry, government and academic leaders established the Texas Natural Gas Foundation, a nonprofit educational organization working to further increase public awareness, support and knowledge of the benefits of using Texas’ natural gas.
Working Together on Oversight
Porter is continuing the theme of public outreach and stakeholder involvement by directing Commission staff to hold another set of statewide workshops aimed at opening the lines of communication with local officials and regulatory bodies. The Railroad Commission’s municipal workshops were created in light of one of the biggest hot-button issues facing the oil and gas industry today: local control.
In November 2014, Denton voters approved a citywide ban on hydraulic fracturing after mounting tensions and miscommunications between the city, residents, oil and gas producers, and the Railroad Commission. Lawsuits were immediately filed questioning the constitutionality of the ban, arguing this authority fell under the purview of state regulators.
Before the courts could weigh in, the Texas Legislature passed legislation on the matter. House Bill 40 set out to clarify and reinforce state law by enumerating the jurisdiction of the state and that of municipalities over oil and gas regulation in Texas.
Consequently, the Denton hydraulic fracturing ban was eventually overturned and the suits dropped.
In an effort to work together with cities toward avoiding any further ambiguity or misunderstandings, Porter has taken the lead on initiating a series of working sessions involving RRC senior and district staff, mayors, city managers, inspectors and others who deal directly with oil and gas activity on the local levels.
“What we really want to do is sit down with the cities and have a conversation so they can fully understand the policies, procedures and capabilities of the Railroad Commission; see if there are any areas where they feel there are gaps that we should look at; and let them know who they can call to talk to if they have questions or need something inspected,” the Chairman explains.
The first meetings were held in October and the remainder are scheduled to take place over the following several months.
Overseeing Historic Rule-Makings
Porter has certainly devoted significant time and energy on public and stakeholder involvement outside the Commission, but these efforts have in no way precluded him from being actively engaged in the daily activities and his important responsibilities within the agency’s walls.
In fact, since taking office the Chairman has overseen a near-record amount of rule revisions in order to keep the Railroad Commission’s regulations current and up-to-date.
“Because of the rapid technical changes, particularly hydraulic fracturing with horizontal drilling and the changes that have arisen from that technology, the whole drilling paradigm has basically shifted from a vertical world to a horizontal world and there’s been a significant increase in activity,” he explains.
For example, the Commission revamped its outdated water recycling regulations in March 2013 to reflect advancements in the field.
“We found that, with the changes in technology, some of our rules were actually inhibiting water recycling rather than encouraging it,” Porter recalls.
Amendments to the rules clarified recycling permit requirements and eliminated operators’ need for a permit to recycle water on their lease or to transfer fluid to another operator’s lease to be recycled.
In May 2013, the Railroad Commission also adopted amendments to Statewide Rule 13 regarding well casing, cementing and integrity standards. Commission staff worked closely with stakeholders and interested parties for over a year to carefully craft a workable rule, which contains some of the most stringent requirements on well casing and integrity in the country.
“By going above and beyond any federal requirements and exceeding almost every other state’s standards, we’re sending a strong message to the federal government that we in Texas are best able to regulate the oil and gas industry in our state,” the Chairman says.
In October 2014, the Commission adopted changes to its rules governing disposal and injection in response to a string of seemingly unexplained seismic events in areas of North Texas beginning in late 2013.
Media and environmentalists were quick to blame the tremors on oil and gas activity. While there has been some speculative correlation between disposing large amounts of fluid into certain formations and seismicity, the science is still inconclusive.
I’m proud that I never had a government office or paid position before I ran for Railroad Commissioner. I really still don’t consider myself a politician.
Even so, Porter took what many would call a political risk, and in January 2014 he hosted a packed town hall meeting in the heart of the activity — Azle, Texas. Roughly 800 attendees showed up for the emotionally charged session that lasted well into the evening.
“Although I was troubled to hear what these residents have been and are experiencing, I believe it is important to listen to their accounts firsthand to better understand their concerns,” Porter said at the time. “My goal was to reassure residents that their concerns are not falling on deaf ears and that the Railroad Commission is engaged and involved in gathering more evidence and data.”
Following the meeting, Porter relayed the experiences and concerns of residents to his fellow Commissioners and instructed the RRC Executive Director to begin a nationwide search for a qualified in-house Seismologist. Dr. Craig Pearson was hired as the RRC’s Seismologist shortly after and has assisted the Commission in analyzing and understanding relevant scientific data, as well as collaborating with outside academic and research institutions.
Correspondingly, the Commission adopted amendments to Statewide Rules 9 and 46, which now take into account any prior or potential existence of seismic events in a given area. Disposal applicants must conduct a search of the U.S. Geological Survey’s seismic database for historic seismic activity within a 100-mile radius of the proposed well. The rules also reinforce the Commission’s authority to shut-in a well, revoke a permit or require any additional information deemed necessary at any given time.
Additionally, the state agency has been extremely active and diligent in inspecting all wells in the vicinity of any seismic occurrence to ensure no loss in well integrity and protections.
While the RRC continues to study and monitor these events and review all data and information, the Commissioners, especially Porter, must be commended for their quick yet measured and effective response.
Fighting the Feds
While Porter’s ability to get things done and bring people together may be the trademark of his tenure, the secondary pillar supporting his success on the Commission is his unwavering defense of state primacy of regulation over the oil and gas industry.
“The other major reason I decided to run for Railroad Commissioner was my concern over the increasing overreach of the federal government,” Porter says. “It became apparent the feds wanted to take over state regulation, specifically of the oil and gas industry, which I knew would be a huge negative for the state of Texas, the industry itself and, indeed, the economy of the nation.”
During his nearly six years in office, the state regulator has adamantly fought repeated attempts by the federal government to control energy production in Texas. He begins to rattle off a laundry list of power grabs, primarily spearheaded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), starting with what he calls its “failed witch-hunt” involving Texas-based Range Resources.
In December 2010, the EPA made headlines when it issued an emergency order against Range Resources in response to a claim of water well contamination in Parker County, Texas. The environmental agency claimed there was “an imminent and substantial risk of explosion or fire” and contended there were “two people whose houses could explode.”
The RRC quickly responded to the claims as well, launching a full-scale investigation. After thorough review and examination of all the evidence, the Commission definitively concluded that the presence of natural gas in the water well was not caused by Range Resources’ drilling activity. Instead, the gas was naturally occurring and actually came from the much more shallow Strawn field. More importantly, there was no risk of fire or explosion.
More than a year later, in March 2012, the EPA quietly backpedaled and withdrew the Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Order. Regardless, Porter says the federal agency still managed to create quite a firestorm of controversy around the situation and points out that this is just one example in a pattern of similar events.
“This case and others like it in Pennsylvania and Wyoming prove that the EPA has no problem using extreme and frankly irresponsible tactics to further its political agenda, with no regard for science or fact,” the Texas regulator says. “Sensationalism and propaganda have no place in sound public policy.”
The EPA more recently made headlines when it issued the Clean Power Plan in August, requiring a roughly 30 percent decrease in carbon emissions from power plants by 2030.
But the numbers and science back up the power industry’s claims that it was voluntarily making strides in this area without the need for costly government regulations. From 2005 to 2013, carbon emissions from the sector had already been on the decline, falling nearly 15 percent.
To Porter, the federal mandate represents a significant and unnecessary burden to Texas, saying he’s especially concerned with the detrimental impact on the already-strained power grid and the tremendous economic implications.
“As much as Texas has grown and continues to grow, we need electricity from every source possible,” the Chairman says. “If we lose a lot of coal plants and electrical generating capacity, I am gravely concerned about what that will mean for the day-to-day well-being of all Texans.”
The Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which is responsible for 90 percent of Texas’ power load, has said it could be forced to retire between 3.3 and 8.7 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity, resulting in widespread reliability issues and increased costs to consumers. One outside estimate shows electricity costs in Texas could increase by more than $30 billion, with individual households’ electricity and gas bills rising more than 50 percent by 2020.
Porter sees through the seemingly arbitrary, onerous guidelines and points to a relatively strong correlation between states that did not vote in favor of our current president and those targeted in the plan.
“I think it’s largely political payback rather than reasonable policy,” he stipulates.
But, Porter continues, the EPA didn’t stop there. Shortly after, it issued new rules targeting ambitious and equally arduous reductions of methane and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by the oil and gas industry, as part of the federal administration’s overall goal of a 40 percent decrease in methane emissions by 2025. Porter says these regulations will also carry a significant economic cost, potentially crippling energy production in Texas.
The EPA may be the most prominent adversary in the fight over oil and gas regulation, but the Chairman says he credits the Obama administration for getting more creative and finding other agencies to carry out its agenda.
The EPA recently partnered with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to dramatically expand jurisdiction over oil and gas activity under what Porter calls the guise of water regulation with the Waters of the U.S. rule, which makes substantial changes to definitions used in the Clean Water Act.
The Bureau of Land Management is also chiming in, as it has been working on rules governing hydraulic fracturing on public lands, which many view as a precursor to the federal government regulating private leases.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has become increasingly concerned with the protection of obscure species that happen to reside in some of Texas’ most prolific oil and gas producing regions — whether it be the earless spot-tailed lizard in the Eagle Ford or the lesser prairie chicken in West Texas.
“A whole slew of things just keep coming down the track,” Porter concludes. “You deflect one, you defend from one, and there’s three more behind it that are trying to run you over.”
As the Chairman of the Railroad Commission, Porter is active in defending Texas from potentially harmful federal regulations. Most recently, he led the RRC in joining in a multiagency, multistate lawsuit to combat against the EPA’s expansion of the Waters of the U.S. rule.
David Porter is a leader who has the experience and proven track record of standing up and doing what’s best for the industry and for Texans, and one who is eager to keep fighting the good fight.
The Chairman spends a lot of time on the defense, but he recently took a proactive stance in advocating for the repeal of the crude oil export ban. In July, he testified before the U.S. Agriculture Committee in favor of removing the antiquated restrictions. In early October, the U.S. House approved a measure overturning the ban.
Continuing to Do the Job
There is certainly no shortage of issues facing the oil and gas industry.
At times, it appears as if another obstacle arises at nearly every turn and on every level — from local communities banning drilling and seismic phenomena, to environmental groups’ anti-industry campaigns and encroachment by the federal government; all the way up to volatility in the global commodities market and foreign countries’ stronghold over pricing and supply.
It would seem more important now than ever to have a leader on the RRC as selfless and humble, yet stalwart and steady, as David Porter. He’s a leader who has the experience and proven track record of standing up and doing what’s best for the industry and for Texans, and one who is eager to keep fighting the good fight.
“I intend to continue accomplishing whatever we need to accomplish, regardless of what comes our way,” Porter says, as he looks forward to a potential second term. “Sometimes you have to do the work behind the scenes; other times you have to get out in front and lead the band. I can do, and have done, both. Whatever it takes to get the job done.”
To learn more about Chairman Porter and the Railroad Commission, visit www.rrc.state.tx.us.